top of page

Talking About Diversity, Equity, and Belonging

  • Writer: Thomas Jones
    Thomas Jones
  • Nov 10, 2021
  • 4 min read




Recently I attended a webinar titled "Foundations of Diversity, Equity, and Belonging". It was presented by the Dean of Students staff at an Ivy League university. The centerpiece of the presentation was a "Social Identity Wheel"which included ten categories of identity:

1) Race/Ethnicity,

2) Age,

3) Gender/Gender Identity,

4) Sexual Orientation,

5) National Origin/Citizenship Status,

6) First Language,

7) Level of Education,

8) Physical/Emotional/Developmental Ability,

9) Religion/Spiritual Affiliation, and

10) Socio-Economic status.

The Social Identity Wheel is used to define each person's "social identity" based on their category/group memberships. The presenter suggested four "Key Terms": Social Identity; Privilege & Advantages; Marginalization & Disadvantages; and Social Location/Positionality.

The thrust of the program was to single out the Privilege & Advantages ("unearned benefits") enjoyed by whites, and the Marginalization & Disadvantages ("physical and emotional harm") suffered by BIPOCs (Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color). The presenter made a pitch for program participants to become "Allies" with personal commitment to fighting oppression and prejudice.

The presenter also outlined the Dean of Students Diversity & Inclusion organization structure (Asian and Asian American Center; LGBT Resource Center; Women's Resource Center; Office of Spirituality and Meaning Making; Undocumented Student Support; Multicultural Student Leadership & Empowerment; First-Generation and Low-Income Student Support). Finally, the presenter noted that all of this university's academic colleges and units have Diversity & Inclusion offices; there are Presidential Advisers on Diversity & Equity (PADE); and Advancing Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity training modules are mandatory for university staff.

I have three observations to share. The first is a sense of sadness that an elite university is devoting this level of resources and energy to encouraging students to focus on"social identity" and personal scorecards of advantages or disadvantages. This university employs a sizable bureaucracy to run programs which emphasize our differences and separate us into categories. I wonder if comparable resources are devoted to programs which attempt to shape a shared identity for those who are or will become American citizens, and who will inherit responsibility for helping our country to overcome our racial and cultural divisions, and who should set positive examples of how the "best and brightest" come together across our differences?

One of the program's "Key Terms" is "Marginalization & Disadvantages". It is appropriate, and necessary, to teach that America's history marginalized and disadvantaged BIPOCs through chattel slavery of Africans, genocide against Indigenous people, and vicious discrimination against Asian immigrants. But it is equally appropriate, and necessary, to teach that in modern-era America BIPOCs have achieved the highest levels of every profession and occupation, and discrimination against BIPOCs has been eliminated from the American legal canon. If we want to encourage BIPOC students to be high-achievers, which is an appropriate goal for the Dean of Students Office, we should teach them the truth that BIPOC high-achievers share the character traits of optimism, shun "victim mentality", believe they can control their own destiny, and believe America is a country of freedom and opportunity.

My second observation regards who I am according to the "Social Identity Wheel": black; early 70's; male; heterosexual; American citizen; English language; advanced education; superior physical/emotional/developmental ability; Episcopalian; and top 1% economically. These might be useful descriptors of some aspects of my social profile but they are not determinative, and do not define who I am. Life experience has taught me that moral character is the most important determinant of my identity, followed closely by personal discipline. Our identities are defined most significantly by what we do and how we live -- the decisions made every day to do, or not do, the right thing and to give, or not give, one's best efforts -- and are not assembled from an assortment of category descriptors.

My third observation is that this program's underlying ideology, which is critical race theory, encourages seeing blacks as victims of America's "ongoing systemic racism". Our country is certainly guilty of grievous harms inflicted on BIPOCs, but it is also the birthplace of the noble aspirational language "...all men are created equal...endowed...with certain unalienable Rights...Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness". America is the world's foremost beacon of equality, freedom, and opportunity. Who can deny that our country has progressed closer to achieving these goals? America is on a journey that likely will never end because it's unlikely we will ever be a perfect nation. But with each century, and each generation, we have inched closer to the goal. What person, or country, could bear to be judged solely by the worst aspects of their history rather than fair and balanced consideration of both their sins and the better aspects of who they are?

It's ironic that this university recently launched a major capital campaign in which one of the major goals is scholarships and support services for low-income students. Why should anyone want to support programs which practice this indoctrination that breeds alienation, encourages "victim mentality", and undermines the social cohesion critical for America's future? Every student at this Ivy League university, including BIPOCs, is blessed with having received unique opportunity and advantage. Few, if any, have a moral basis for claiming their good fortune is somehow "deserved", while others' is "undeserved".

What do you think?

7 Comments


snmcycling
Nov 11, 2021

I found your blog completely by chance, after I learned that Skip Meade had passed. That was shocking and sad news. Though I saw Skip only rarely in the Berkshires, where I lived for about 40 years before retiring and moving away, we were friends before that at Cornell. He was a year ahead of me, class of '69 while I was class of '70, and he was a supportive bright light in my world, someone I was always glad to see, who made me feel better if I was down,who was always smart, interesting and fun to talk to, someone who lifted my spirits. Though I didn't much see him after that, I was quite certainly aware of hi…


Like

tedrhudson
tedrhudson
Nov 10, 2021

"America is the world's foremost beacon of equality, freedom, and opportunity. Who can deny that our country has progressed closer to achieving these goals?"

It seems to me we have taken several steps backwards in the last half-decade. Our previous President has given license for the worst behavior of a substantial chunk of our White populace. I have read enough of commentators like Lonnae O'Neal and Michelle Singletary to learn of microaggressions endured by many Blacks in this country, and have tried to avoid them myself. I am also acutely conscious of my white privilege: I have been stopped by police while driving two or three times in the last decade, but the worst I feared was getting a…


Like
tedrhudson
tedrhudson
Dec 06, 2021
Replying to

Mr. Levitt, thanks for your comment. I don't think I would change anything. Would not be honest.

I agree with Tom that kids should be taught about the accomplishments of minority people, and the possibility of accomplishment, not just their victimization. But I believe it is vital to resist the white-supremacist impulses that are becoming dominant in so many of our states, where teachers are fired or threatened with firing for teaching about racism and discussing white privilege. See the feature article in today's Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2021/12/06/tennessee-teacher-fired-critical-race-theory/ I don't think it is possible to reason or "debate" with people who believe the election was stolen and are working to suppress minority voting and to allow state legislatures to overturn legitimate…

Like

jkbitting
Nov 10, 2021

I agree. Consider having the NYT and WSJ publish this!

Like

mschaefer56
Nov 10, 2021

I agree with you. All those defining categories are quite boring. If I didn't know who I was by arriving at college, none of those categories would help me. How about defining categories by interest, for example, music, art, sports, engineering, or science?

These are areas where diversity is a lot more interesting. It is my experience that black people are as diverse in their interests as any other group.

I would prefer to see these institutions spend their money encouraging diversity across interest groups. Create programs where a student with a strong interest in one area could have experiences in a different area. I realize that this is called the old-fashioned "well-rounded" education. The new experiences would need to…

Like

judyatbank
Nov 10, 2021

YOU ARE 100% RIGHT, TOM. SPREAD THE WORD.

Like
bottom of page